Lightning Jar - Web Studio Lightning Jar Wordmark

Study U · Views & grounding

The view that can't see the answer doesn't fail; it makes something up

Document-carried dependencies

Study Overview

Dependent Edits

Focused views assume the instruction carries every value an edit needs. Study U built the class where it doesn't: dependent edits ("set A's content to the same value as B's", "rename A to B's name") whose needed value is verified absent from the instruction AND from the rendered target-only view.

Ninety Confident Fictions

That view failed all 90 cells across both models; and every single failure was a valid patch containing a silently invented value: zero refusals, zero invalid artifacts, 90/90 confident fictions that validate and apply.

The One-Line Fix

The fix is one line: put both mentioned nodes in the focus ids. That scores a perfect 90/90; descriptively better than the whole tree, which fumbled 3 structure-reads at ~1000 nodes on sonnet; at ~1.7k median input tokens, 25× less than the full tree.

Search Reads Values Badly

The shipped search recipe can self-serve reads at 82–84% (median 2–3 calls), significantly short of full-tree parity on gemini (p = 0.008) and weakest on value-copies (75%): search grounds targets at oracle level, but reading values is the application's job. Focus ids = every node the request mentions.


Charts & Tables

Chart U.1: Dependent-Edit Success by View and Model


Table U.1: Success by arm and kind, failure anatomy, and cost